|
|
|
|
School Improvement Plan 2012-2013
|
School Improvement
Plan
|
|
School Name: New Manchester High
School
|
School Year: 2012-2013
|
|
Principal Name: Connie Craft
|
Title I Program:
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
X
|
No
|
|
Current Status:
|
|
|
|
Priority
|
|
Focus
|
|
Alert
|
|
Implementing (Select all that apply):
|
|
X
|
School Improvement Plan (School Improvement
Plans are due to Area Director by August 31,
2012).
|
|
|
Flexible Learning Plan (FLP)
|
|
Principal's Signature: Connie
Craft
|
Date: August 31, 2012
|
|
Area Director's Signature:
|
Date:
|
|
Associate Superintendent's Signature:
|
Date:
|
|
School Improvement
Plan
|
|
1. Provide a narrative description of the
school, the community and educational programs/practices used every
day. Describe your school including instruction,
communication, parent and community involvement, etc. What do
you do every day and what is the understood expectation in
instruction, communication, organization, inclusiveness,
etc.? What are the expectations of teachers regarding
planning and implementing? How do teachers and administrators
monitor for consistency? What specific instructional strategies are
used and expected by all - vocabulary, reading, writing across the
curriculum, student-focused instruction (what does it look like),
integration of technology, hands-on, applied student instruction in
all subject areas, etc. What are the common strategies that
will be used by all? How is this monitored? How is that
evaluated and shared?
|
|
New Manchester High School (NMHS) is now in its second year of
operation as the fifth and newest high school in Douglas County
with both the faculty and the students being a blend of the
existing educational community. In addition to the expected student
achievement norms, NMHS also has two specific focal points of
development: (1) being a 21st Century Technology
School; and (2) becoming a Performing Arts Magnet School over the
next three years. Our goal is to support student achievement
in a variety of ways, including the two areas of focus.
NMHS teachers maintain their high expectations for student
performance in all classes. It is our belief that student
performance rises to match expectation, and as a faculty we will
support raising the bar for all. Teachers meet weekly with
their Common Course Teams to discuss student needs based on data
generated from common assessments. Baseline data will be
gathered on each student via a common course pretest so that
instructional planning will be accurate and differentiated as
indicated by student performance. Interventions coming from
Common Course Team discussions should be evident in lesson plans
and classroom delivery of instruction. Implementation of the
instruction and possible interventions will continue to be
monitored by the administrative team via walkthroughs, formal and
informal observations, attendance at Common Course Team Meetings
and individual conferences with teachers. Feedback from the
observers is vital to improvement in classroom instructions.
Teachers will continue to incorporate Learning Focused School
strategies in the delivery of instruction, essential questions
posted and discussed, standards listed and explained; graphic
organizers, differentiation strategies, assessment strategies, and
tickets out the door. Instruction should be student focused
with an array of assessments (including project based, oral
performance, rubrics, etc.) utilized to determine student mastery
of standards.
As a BYOT (Bring Your Own Technology) school, NMHS
supports the integration of technology in instructional
practices. Teachers will be trained to use the Promethium
Boards, slates, and student response devices that are available to
them in their classrooms. Classroom sets of netbooks are available
in each of the school's instructional wings for teacher/student
use. Furthermore, teacher trainers will provide INTEL
training on how to support the use of technology in the classroom
as lessons are being planned. Students are encouraged to
bring their technology devices to support learning. Common
District Assessments will be utilized to determine student growth
via Thinkgate.
The goal of the New Manchester High School Fine Arts Department
is to establish ourselves officially as a Fine Arts Magnet
program. The department will promote Visual Arts, Band,
Chorus, Dance, and Drama through various performance classes and
ensembles. Year two will be focused on retention and
recruitment. The department will ensure that all students are
educated with a rigorous curriculum and are held to the highest of
expectations set forth by the county and the state.
|
|
School Improvement
Plan
|
|
2. Data information. Data should describe
strengths and challenges. Examples include data pertaining to
overall school/student performance, attendance, instructional
practices from walk throughs/observations, student learning, GAPSS
data and parent involvement programs. Describe what you find
clearly so that stakeholders understand.
• What does the data tell you about your
school's strengths?
• What does the data tell you about your
school's opportunities for improvement?
|
|
As New Manchester High School reviews its first year
data, we rely heavily on our EOCT scores. This data indicates
that all four content areas need to be strengthened with math being
first and foremost. Ninth Grade Language Arts and Economics
had a pass rate of 80% or better. The other six content areas
will work toward making that 80% mark, with special emphasis being
to math comprehension. As the year progresses, we will
collect data on the performance of our students based
on:
- Course grades for all students - monitor at
regular intervals
- Performance on Common District Assessments - all
students
- Attendance, demographics, gender, and disciplinary
issues
- Individual teacher proficiency measures - student
achievement indicators, discipline issues, common course team
participation
- Walkthrough data
- Teacher attendance data
- Variety of assessment measures utilized by teachers;
use of rubrics
- Teacher grading practices
- End of Course (EOCT) Assessments - CCGPS Algebra; Math
I and II; Ninth Lit.; Am. Lit.; Biology; Physical Science; US
History; Economics
- Lexile Score - establish baselines for all students in
order to measure growth
- AimsWeb data for ninth and tenth grade
students
- GHSWT - Eleventh Grade Students
- End of Pathway Exams - all CTAE
completers
- Common Course Pre/Post Tests given to all students in
all courses - a minimum of 10% growth is
expected.
|
|
School Improvement
Plan
|
|
3. Based on the data, what 3-5 goals for improvement
emerge for your school? (Use the Template Provided ) Cite
relevant evidence from your data (in all areas) to support the
goals. What strategies will the school use to address these
goals (no more than 3 strategies)? The strategies you select
will address your specific goals and be in addition to what you do
every day. All staff will know those strategies and implement
them consistently and pervasively across your school.
Strategies will be detailed on the school improvement plan
template.
Strategies should:
• Be researched based.
• Provide opportunities for ALL children in the
school, including targeted populations, to meet or exceed
standards.
• Use effective instructional methods that
increase the quality and amount of learning time.
|
|
New Manchester High School will focus on the following
goals:
- All students will be monitored through data generated
from common assessments. This data will be the focal point of
all Common Course Team Meetings.
- Interventions will be developed for all students
identified through data as having not mastered an assessed
standard. These interventions will be noted and analyzed for
success in meeting student needs.
- All teachers will utilize Learning Focused School
strategies and technological resources as they develop and
implement lessons for classroom presentation.
•4.
Professional development will be provided to support
teachers seeking professional growth in the use of technology or
content specific growth/presentation strategies.
|
|
School Improvement
Plan
|
|
4. Describe the school staff, including the Hi-Q
status of all professional staff. What strategies are used to
recruit, build capacity and retain effective, highly qualified
teachers (leadership-administrative/teacher, mentoring,
professional learning, etc.)? (Describe specific
strategies you are using to promote the CLASS Keys
Self-Assessment/Reflection and Professional Growth Plan. What do
you do to hire a highly qualified staff based on district
procedures, initiatives and programs in your building? This
will require that you look at your school's strengths and
weaknesses in your decisions. Your staff decisions should be based
on the needs of your students. What do you provide to increase
retention: developing teacher leadership capacity, professional
development, processes and procedures in place that provide a
strong foundation for a healthy culture and work environment,
student results, etc.)
|
|
Annually, one of the primary goals in selecting teachers
is to ensure that each person hired is highly qualifed, and we have
100% achievement on that goal. However, a number of our
teachers are first year hires, so we have identified the Lead
Mentor teacher, Ms. Tekmekia Gilchrist, to meet with the new
teachers monthly, or more often as needed, to support their
instructional practices, duties and responsibilities, and classroom
management needs. Each new teacher has also been assigned a
"Buddy" teacher from within their individual departments who can be
the "go to" person on a daily basis to provide support and answer
questions.
All teachers and administrators have been trained in the
elements of Class Keys and have been provided with a notebook with
dividers to use as their portfolio for evidence collection over the
course of the school year. Once reflections are completed,
each department develops a professional growth goal based on the
common challenges that emerged from the departmental discussion of
the reflections. A student achievement goal has been
developed for the entire school that will measure student
performance growth over the course of the school year. This
measureable goal is based on a required Pre/Post Test that each
common course team will develop and administer by September 15,
2012 and again by April 1, 2013. The expectation is that each
student will improve minimally by 10% between both test
administrations. The faculty has also been divided among the
administrative team for evaluation purposes so that each teacher
knows which administrator has been assigned to cover his/her
department. The assigned administrators will also be
responsible for monitoring common course team meetings and
examining data generated by the teams. The administrators
will provide feedback to faculty via walkthroughs and
informal/formal observations. Any teacher deemed to be
at-risk will be placed on a PDP and will be given additional
support to help remediate any identified
deficiencies.
All teachers are given the opportunity to be active
stakeholders by participating on the School Improvement Committee;
serving as a department co-chair (each department has two
co-chairs), partcipating on the Aspiring Leadership Committee;
serving as a participant in the common district assessment process
and providing redelivery to the faculty; serving as a technology
trainer (these teachers have opportunities to attend specific
technology based training courses); and serving as sponsors for
various clubs and/or extracurricular activities for students.
All teachers are encouraged to become members of the NMHS PTSA, as
well.
|
|
School Improvement
Plan
|
|
|
5. Describe professional development activities that are
offered at the school which enable all children in the school to
meet performance standards. (Use the DCSS Three Year Professional
Learning Plan Template attached) Include when and how the
learning takes place through "Initiative Training"? What does
it look like through "Monitoring for Implementation"
(differentiated, job-embedded, collaborative, shared, etc.)?
Describe how the Professional Learning impacted teacher knowledge
and student learning through "Evaluation" (multiple
measures). Also, use the DCSS: Standards Based
Classroom Instructional Framework (LFS).
|
|
|
The professional development activities projected for
New Manchester High School this year include:
- Training for all teachers in the following areas
of technology:
•a.
Promethium Board/slate training -
beginner/proficient/advanced training provided by DCSS
Technology
•b.
Student Response Device training - DCSS Technology - each
teacher will have a class set
•c.
Infinite Campus Training - DCSS Technology - available for
teachers as needed
•d.
Moodle Training - DCSS Technology - available for all
teachers
•e.
Tech Updates - In-house Trainers - available to all to
support new innovations as they appear
•f.
Thinkgate Training - In-house Trainers - all teachers -
implementation of common district assessments
•g.
AIMSweb Training - In-house Trainers - ninth and tenth
teachers - skills diagnostic
•h.
LFS Training - Refresher course for those who need it; full
course for new teachers
•i.
Edmodo Training - In-house trainers - available for
teachers as needed
- Professional Learning - courses needed to support
content understanding or instructional delivery as requested by
teachers
The implementation of the practices acquired from the
professional development opportunities will be monitored via
administrative walkthroughs, observations, and individual meetings
with teachers. The goal is for all professional development
outcomes to become job embedded practices.
|
School Improvement
Plan
|
|
6. Describe ongoing
professional development activities that will be offered to
instructional staff at the school to address the integration of
technology within the curriculum. (Attach a copy of your
school's technology plan) Include when and how the learning
will take place. What will the professional development look
like? How will you account for differences in levels of
proficiency? How will you monitor and evaluate the use of
technology in the classroom?
|
New Manchester High School participated in the Wayfind
Survey that identified perceived proficiency levels for technology
usage. Based on that data and teacher requests, professional
development is being offered in Promethean Board usage, student
response device use, slate use, and teachers have completed Intel
training that offers a plethora of instructional
resources.
In order to monitor proficiency levels, teachers will be
given an assignment that must be observed by one of the in-house
technology instructors in order to receive credit for any
proficiency training.
Please see the attached technology
plan.
|
|
School Improvement
Plan
|
|
|
7. Describe strategies to increase parental
involvement in the classroom, school, and instruction of their
child (leading other parents), capacity-building, communication,
etc.).
|
|
|
New Manchester High School in increasing parent
involvement in the following ways:
- Supporting the New Manchester High School PTSA -
first general meeting was held August 28, 2012 - officers have been
elected and meeting dates established for the entire school
year. All faculty members are encouraged to join
PTSA.
- Parent Volunteers - a number of PTSA parents have asked
to serve as volunteers during the school day. They are being
directed to have background checks so that we can have them on
campus during the school day. Parent volunteers helped direct
students to classes during the first two days of school and have
asked to help further however we may need them.
- School Council - both parents and partners in education
will be invited to serve with teachers and students on the School
Council.
- Booster Clubs - parents of students participating in
extracurricular activities have been invited to be part of the
booster clubs supporting the various groups and
entities.
- NMHS Website - we are instructing parents to monitor
our school website for current information about student and school
events.
- "Notify Me" is also a feature which parents are
encouraged to register for in order to receive school system
information in a timely manner.
- Parent Nights - several parent nights have been planned
for the school year, including AP Parent Night and Math Parent
Night. The counselors will meet with parents of each grade
level on Freshman, Sophomore, Junior and Senior Parent
nights.
- Honor Societies - parents are invited to attend
induction ceremonies of the National Honor Society, and National
French and Spanish Honor Societies.
- School Marquee - display upcoming events on our
signboard adjacent to the entry way to the
school.
- Guidance Newsletters - designed to keep parents
informed of grade specific events and needs, including grade
specific parent nights.
- Technology Resources - teachers can involve parents by
using the technology sites such as Infinite Campus, Edmoto, Remind
101, and Moodle to keep parents abreat of classroom activities such
S tests, projects, or homework deadlines.
|
|
|
School Improvement Plan
(continued)
|
|
School Name: New Manchester High
School
|
|
Principal Name: Connie Craft
|
School Year:
2012-2013
|
|
Measurable Goals:
GOAL #1 - All students will see significant growth in
content course performance (minimum 10%) over the school
year.
|
|
School Keys
Strands
|
Actions, Strategies, and
Interventions
|
Timeline
|
Estimated Costs, Funding
Sources, and Resources
|
Person(s)
Responsible
|
Evaluation of
Implementation
of Strategies and
Impact on Student Learning
|
|
Artifacts
|
Evidence
|
|
C2.1
C3.1
A1.1
A1.2
A1.3
A1.4
A2.1
A3.1
I1.1
I1.3
I2.1
I2.3
I2.6
PL2.1
|
Common course assessments will be utilized to establish
baseline data on student performance in each content
course
Common Course Teams will meet to analyze data from
common assessments
Interventions/differentiation will be provided to meet
student needs for standards mastery
Student Performance data will be analyzed to measure
growth in performance
|
August - September 2012
August 2012 - May 2013
August 2012 - May 2013
April 2013
|
Common Course Pre/Post Tests
Thinkgate
AIMSweb
Common District Assessments
|
Teachers
Administrators
In-house Trainers
|
Classroom grades per assessment
Common Course Team Minutes
Documentation of interventions
Lesson Plans indicating interventions and/or
differentiation strategies
|
Data reflecting individual student performance from base
point to March collection of data
|
|
School Improvement Plan
(continued)
|
|
School Name: New Manchester High
School
|
|
Principal Name: Connie Craft
|
School Year:
2012-2013
|
|
Measurable Goals:
GOAL #2 - All teachers will utilize LFS instructional
strategies in presenting standards to students.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Artifacts
|
Evidence
|
|
C2.1
C3.1
A1.1
A1.2
A1.3
A1.4
A2.1
A3.1
I1.1
I1.3
I2.1
I2.3
I2.6
PL2.1
|
New teachers will receive LFS training
All teachers will incorporate LFS strategies into their
daily lesson presentations
Walkthrough Observations
Formal/Informal Class Key Observations
|
August - December 2012
August 2012 - May 2013
August 2012 - May 2013
August 2012 - May 2013
|
Professional Development Training - DCSS
LFS Walkthrough Template
|
Teachers
Administrators
|
Lesson Plans reflecting LFS strategies
Walkthrough and observational documentation
|
All teachers have documentation of implementing LFS
strategies in instruction
|
|
School Improvement Plan
(continued)
|
|
School Name: New Manchester High
School
|
|
Principal Name: Connie Craft
|
School Year:
2012-2013
|
|
Measurable Goals:
GOAL #3 - 100% of the NMHS faculty will complete
training for using technologial resources and/or for specific
course needs.
|
|
School Keys
Strands
|
Actions, Strategies, and
Interventions
|
Timeline
|
Estimated Costs, Funding
Sources, and Resources
|
Person(s)
Responsible
|
Evaluation of
Implementation
of Strategies and
Impact on Student Learning
|
|
Artifacts
|
Evidence
|
|
I2.7
PL1.1
PL1.4
PL1.5
PL2.1
PL2.3
PL2.5
|
Technology training will be provided for:
Promethium Boards
Promethium Slates
Student Response Devices
Thinkgate
AIMSweb
Moodle
IC Training
Misc. Tech Training
Content or course requirement training as
needed
|
August 2012 - May 2013
August 2012 - May 2013
|
No cost is expected - in-house trainers will be
utilized
|
Teachers
Administrators
|
Class Registration Information
Attendance logs for training
|
Attendance information data for faculty to support 100%
participation in training over the course of school
year
|
|
DCSS: Three Year
Professional Learning Development Plan
|
|
Professional Learning FY12
*Indicates emphasis for year
|
Professional Learning FY13
*Indicates emphasis for year
|
Professional Learning FY14
*Indicates emphasis for year
|
|
1. Initiative Training:
Thinkgate/AIMSweb Training
|
1. Initiative Training:
Thinkgate/AIMSweb Training
|
1. Initiative Training:
Fine Arts Magnet
|
|
-Monitoring for implementation:
Administrative Team - Common Course Teams
|
-Monitoring for implementation:
Administrative Team - Common Course Teams
|
-Monitoring for implementation:
Administrative Team - Common Course Teams -
CDA's
|
|
-Evaluation:
Class Keys element - Leader Keys
|
-Evaluation:
Class Keys element - Leader Keys
Membership of 21st Century
Schools
|
-Evaluation:
Judges Sheets from One Act for Drama, LGPE for both
Choral and Instrumental Ensembles, and a working portfolio for
Visual Arts.
|
|
2. Initiative Training:
Promethium Board/Slates/Student Response Devices
Training
|
2. Initiative Training:
INTEL - technology integration into
instruction
|
2. Initiative Training:
A member of the Fine Arts Dept. will attend a conference
and present to the rest of the department.
|
|
-Monitoring for implementation:
Administrative Team - Common Course Teams
|
-Monitoring for implementation:
Administrative Team - Common Course Teams
|
-Monitoring for implementation:
Fine Arts Director and Fine Arts Chair
|
|
-Evaluation:
Class Keys - Administrators
|
-Evaluation:
Class Keys - Administrators
|
-Evaluation:
Class Keys - Performance Judges
|
|
•3.
Initiative Training:
LFS Training - refresher for trained
|
3. Initiative Training:
|
3. Initiative Training:
|
|
-Monitoring for implementation:
Administrative Team - Com. Course Team
|
-Monitoring for implementation:
|
-Monitoring for implementation:
|
|
-Evaluation:
Class Keys - Administrators
|
-Evaluation:
|
-Evaluation:
|
SCHOOL: New
Manchester High
School
.
DCSS: Standard Based Classroom Instructional
Framework (LFS)
Please submit your protocol to support the three
components of the LFS Standard Based Classroom
Framework:
- Transforming Standards
- Acquisition Lesson
- Extending/Thinking
|
DCSS: Standard Based Classroom Instructional Framework
(LFS) Implementation and Monitoring Protocol
TRANSFORMING STANDARDS
|
Set and Communicate Expectations
|
Training
|
Review Expectations and Set Up "Look Fors" and "Ask
Abouts"
|
Guided Practice
|
Expected Behavior
|
Evaluated: Consistent Implementation With
Quality
|
|
Leadership Team Discussion and Planning
|
Training with Support Materials
|
- Training Follow-up and Review Meeting with Teachers and
Administrators
- Set Timeline Dates and Expectations
- Discuss Monitoring Guidelines with "Look Fors" and "Ask Abouts"
(walk-through criteria)
|
Teachers Practice Strategies with Monitoring, Coaching, and
Support
|
Teachers Full Implementation Working on Quality with
Monitoring
|
Final Step: Full Implementation as Part of Evaluation
Process
|
|
Timeframe:
|
30-40 Minutes
|
1 Hour to 2-3 Days
|
1-2 Hours
|
6-8 Weeks
|
3-4 Weeks
|
Expected Continuous Behavior
|
|
DATE(S):
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 2013
|
|
DCSS: Standard Based Classroom Instructional Framework
(LFS) Implementation and Monitoring Protocol
ACQUISITION LESSON
|
Set and Communicate Expectations
|
Training
|
Review Expectations and Set Up "Look Fors" and "Ask
Abouts"
|
Guided Practice
|
Expected Behavior
|
Evaluated: Consistent Implementation With
Quality
|
|
Leadership Team Discussion and Planning
|
Training with Support Materials
|
- Training Follow-up and Review Meeting with Teachers and
Administrators
- Set Timeline Dates and Expectations
- Discuss Monitoring Guidelines with "Look Fors" and "Ask Abouts"
(walk-through criteria)
|
Teachers Practice Strategies with Monitoring, Coaching, and
Support
|
Teachers Full Implementation Working on Quality with
Monitoring
|
Final Step: Full Implementation as Part of Evaluation
Process
|
|
Timeframe:
|
30-40 Minutes
|
1 Hour to 2-3 Days
|
1-2 Hours
|
6-8 Weeks
|
3-4 Weeks
|
Expected Continuous Behavior
|
|
DATE(S):
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 2013
|
|
DCSS: Standard Based Classroom Instructional Framework
(LFS) Implementation and Monitoring Protocol
EXTENDING/THINKING
|
Set and Communicate Expectations
|
Training
|
Review Expectations and Set Up "Look Fors" and "Ask
Abouts"
|
Guided Practice
|
Expected Behavior
|
Evaluated: Consistent Implementation With
Quality
|
|
Leadership Team Discussion and Planning
|
Training with Support Materials
|
- Training Follow-up and Review Meeting with Teachers and
Administrators
- Set Timeline Dates and Expectations
- Discuss Monitoring Guidelines with "Look Fors" and "Ask Abouts"
(walk-through criteria)
|
Teachers Practice Strategies with Monitoring, Coaching, and
Support
|
Teachers Full Implementation Working on Quality with
Monitoring
|
Final Step: Full Implementation as Part of Evaluation
Process
|
|
Timeframe:
|
30-40 Minutes
|
1 Hour to 2-3 Days
|
1-2 Hours
|
6-8 Weeks
|
3-4 Weeks
|
Expected Continuous Behavior
|
|
DATE(S):
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|